|
0
registrerede
1199
gæster og
274
søgemaskiner online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Skribent: Hanskrist
Emne: Re: korrigere misforståelser
|
Der er ikke det der ligner SPIRITUALITET i alle dine indlæg gennem årene. Tydeligvis forstår du slet ikke de forudsætninger som ægte SPIRITUALITET bygger på - nemlig
1):
der hvor der er ægte SPIRITUALITET er der altid også FRIHED
2):
Ingen bøger hellige skrifter - kan stå imellem den spirituelle relation mellem Gud og mennesket.
Mange muslimer har en ægte SPIRITUALITET med inde over deres forståelse islam - men du Somo har ikke det der ligner - du kan slet slet ikke være med her.
-0-0-0-
Bertrand Russell compares Islam to Communism (1920)
“Among religions, Bolshevism is to be reckoned with Mohammedanism rather than with Christianity and Buddhism. Christianity and Buddhism are primarily personal religions, with mystical doctrines and a love of contemplation. Mohammedanism and Bolshevism are practical, social, unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of this world. Their founders would not have resisted the third of the temptations in the wilderness. What Mohammedanism did for the Arabs, Bolshevism may do for the Russians. As Ali went down before the politicians who only rallied to the Prophet after his success, so the genuine Communists may go down before those who are now rallying to the ranks of the Bolsheviks. If so, Asiatic empire with all its pomps and splendors may well be the next stage of development, and Communism may seem, in historical retrospect, as small a part of Bolshevism as abstinence from alcohol is of Mohammedanism."
― Bertrand Russell, The Practice and Theory of Bolshevism (1920), Part I. The Present Condition of Russia, Ch. IX: International Policy, p. 106
The Practice and Theory of Bolshevism, first published in 1920, is Bertrand Russell's critique of the Communist system he witnessed in the Soviet Union. Russell, an early proponent of certain and broad Communist ideals, believed that the future happiness of humanity depended upon restructuring the way production and business were run. The Bolsheviks, however, according to Russell, pursued these goals with a murderous and cruel dogmatic manner, rather than with a free, peaceful and idealistic hope that nurtured and specifically targeted the individual, and not necessarily reduced itself to the collective's needs and wants. Russell was also staunchly opposed to the way that Bolshevism, in his view, can be understood as a religion, with practices and beliefs that could brook no doubt. This, he determined, for example, was no better than the revealed and stagnant dogma of the Catholic Church, which he strongly opposed.
|
|
|
|
